Alternative Investment Funds: SEBI’s Progression

INTRODUCTION

On July 20, 2024 the Securities Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) amended SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 significantly. Subsequently, guidelines were released by SEBI to these amendments which are particularly concerning the VCFs which were earlier governed under SEBI (Venture Capital Funds) Regulations, 1996. The change to the Alternative Investment Funds (‘AIF’) Regulations is advantageous to Venture Capital Funds (‘VCF’) as it provides more freedom to the VCFs especially in regard to unliquidated investments at the end of the tenures. The changes are in consonance with SEBI’s intention to amend the legal provisions governing the venture capital funds to suit the current market conditions.

SEBI has been advancing AIF as an ideal investment vehicle in India which has facilitated all forms of funds including venture capital funds, private equity funds and infrastructure funds. As more investors are investing their money in AIFs, SEBI has also upped its ante to make sure that such funds operate in the most transparent manner and for the benefit of the investors. These amendments are a doctrinal transformation of the existing legal framework, to enable VCFs transition to this new flexibility, which improves operational effectiveness and investors’ safeguards. This way, SEBI modernises the previous regulations, adapting them to the present conditions of the market and presents AIFs as a primary stimulator of innovation and investments in the Indian economy.

RATIONALE BEHIND THE NEW GUIDELINES

The rationale for the development of these new guidelines is anchored on shifts that have taken place in the investment climate in India. The VCF Regulations were introduced in 1996 and at that time they were rather innovative. However, the changes in the venture capital industry continue and the regulations have become outdated. The introduction of the AIF Regulations in 2012 was a significant improvement as it offered a more complex and flexible framework for various structures of AIFs including VCFs. However, there were still many VCFs that have been registered under the old regulations but still operated under a structure that was not completely appropriate to the industry’s needs.

The changes in the amendments are directed to the increase in the demand for the harmonization of the regulations and the flexibility. SEBI has provided these VCFs an opportunity to migrate to the AIF Regulations and therefore, avail the benefits of a relatively modern framework. This has included the improvement of the management of unliquidated investments which is crucial to funds that are in the final stages of their life cycle. Also, the amendments seek to bring all funds as one so as to enhance the protection of investors as it is easily regulated.

DECIPHERING THE AMENDMENTS
  • Migration of VCFs to AIF Regulations

The essence of the amendments is in the possibility of the VCFs’ transition to the AIF Regulations. This migration is not compulsory but is very advantageous for anyone who decides to migrate. These changes are beneficial as they allow VCFs to operate through a modern, flexible framework, offering longer liquidation periods, better regulatory reporting and increased investor protection which will lead to improved handling of unliquidated investments and transparency overall. This flexibility is accompanied by the migration deadline of July 19, 2025, which provides VCFs with enough time to take decision about the transition.

The amendments to the AIF Regulation in contiguity with VCF Regulations are expected to have significant effects on India’s venture capital industry. An increase in the regulatory cohesion by SEBI can be enforced by encouraging VCFs to migrate to the AIF framework which will lead to simplification in compliance maintenance by fund managers and clinch all funds under a unified set of regulations.

  • Additional Liquidation Period

    Another significant amendment is the provision for a one-time additional liquidation period. VCFs with schemes whose liquidation period has expired but have not yet wound up their operations can now apply for an additional year to complete the liquidation process. This extension, valid until July 19, 2025, provides much-needed breathing room for fund managers, allowing them to manage their exits more effectively and avoid fire sales that could harm investor returns.

    As for the VCFs with the schemes which have not yet achieved the end of the liquidation period, the migration enables such funds to remain active within the framework of the AIF Regulations. Also, it is important to note that if a fund’s scheme had a defined tenure under the old regulations, such tenure remains frozen on migration. But if no tenure was previously fixed, the fund has to fix a residual tenure with the concurrence of at least three-fourth of the investors. This provision helps to protect the investors and also helps the fund to operate in a very transparent manner.

    • Enhanced Regulatory Reporting in case of non-migration

    In case VCFs do not migrate, SEBI has come up with improved regulatory reporting standards. These funds will be more regulated and if they continue to exist beyond the liquidation period they will face regulatory actions. This aspect of the amendments acts as a form of threat that will compel VCFs which are no longer actively investing to either join the AIF framework or wind up their operations.

    The amendments also specify circumstances under which migration is not possible. VCFs which have no more active investments or have wound up all their schemes are expected to surrender their registration by 31st March 2025. Otherwise, SEBI will proceed to cancel their registration as the latter failed to meet the requirements provided by the former. This provision helps in avoiding the creation of a bureaucratic burden on the regulatory framework by funds that are inactive or dormant, thereby enabling SEBI target active participants in the market.

    The potential of increased fund activity with the option to migrate to a relatively modern regulatory framework, may incentivize VCFs to launch newer schemes or extend the life on present ones. Hence, benefiting both investors and the broader economy by increased activity in the venture capital space. The stipulation for inactive VCFs to surrender their registration will streamline the regulatory landscape. Consequently, ensuring that only active and compliant funds are registered and as a result, reducing administrative burdens and allowing SEBI to focus on more significant regulatory issues.

    • Strict Compliance and Accountability

    Lastly, the amendments impose a great deal of obligation to the managers, trustees, and other personnel of both VCFs and Migrated VCFs. These people are responsible for compliance to the new regulations and they will have to fill and submit the Compliance Test Report to SEBI. This report which is a compliance to the SEBI Master Circular for AIFs is an important mechanism of ensuring that the industry is accountable to the public.

    There can be an enhancement in the investor protection steps taken by SEBI to assure investors that their interests are being safeguarded within a robust regulatory framework. This can be done by necessitating investor approval in ascertaining the tenure of migrated schemes and the insistence on compliance reporting.

    FORGING NEW HORIZONS

    The modifications carried out to the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012are a welcome change for the enhancement of the venture capital funds in India. In the future, SEBI should focus at giving the required assistance to those VCFs that wish to opt for the AIF structure by issuing appropriate instructions and keeping the concerned parties informed. This will assist VCFs to address the operational and compliance challenges of the migration process appropriately. SEBI could also contemplate on the need to carry out regular audits of the framework with a view of making changes that could help to address some of the problems that may arise after migration as well as to ensure that the regulations are up to par with the best practices in the international markets. Moreover, enhancing the investor awareness and increasing the transparency of the mechanisms will help to increase the confidence in AIFs and therefore the capital will flow into the venture capital more freely. Therefore, SEBI can contribute to the formation of the startup market and the non- traditional type of financial instruments in India due to the formation of a more integrated and adaptable system of regulation.

    CONCLUSION

    The proposed amendments to the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012are huge in the growth of venture capital industry in India. Thus, SEBI is ensuring that the regulations are relevant and comprehensive by providing VCFs a chance to move from the VCF Regulations to the AIF Regulations. The emphasis on flexibility, investor protection and compliance are very much seen in the SEBI’s attempt to make the investment environment healthy and active. To the fund managers, investors and the market in general, these amendments introduce a new dimension of understanding and certainty which would help foster the future growth and development of the industry. In the long run, the value of the integrated and updated regulation of the industry will be seen as it adapts to the changes that have been identified.

    This blog is authored by Company Secretary Ronak Gupta. He is author of many blogs and runs many websites and youtube channels. His work is dedicated to corporate laws, legal, secretarial, professional services and also in strategy formulations for corporates. Mail him at: csronakgupta23@gmail.com or call at :9910226715

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    DIR 8 Intimation by Director

    Image
    FORM 'DIR-8' Intimation by Director  [Pursuant to Section 164(2) and rule 14(1) of Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014]   Registration No. of Company Nominal Capital           Rs.  Paid-up Capital Rs.  Name of Company Address of its Registered Office     To, The Board of Directors of XYZ Private Limited I, ________ son/daughter/wife of  __________  resident of  ________________ , Director/Managing Director/Manager in the company hereby give notice that I am/was a director in the following companies during the last three years:-   S.No Name of the Company Date of Appointment Date of Cessation 1   I further confirm that I have not incurre...
    Read more

    Procedure for Name Change of company

    As per the provisions of Companies Act 2013, a Memorandum of Association would contain six clauses- Name Clause, Situation Clause, Object Clause, Liability Clause, Capital Clause, Subscription Clause. Name of a Company or name of anything is the first step of identity of that particular object. Through which we got to know something about. The Company, at anytime,  after incorporation can change their name by following way: (a) Conversion of name from private to public, or (b) Conversion of name from public to private, or (c) Change of name from AB Private Limited to XYZ Private Limited. By following the provisions of section 13 of Companies Act 2013, we can change the name of a Company. Section 13 of the Companies Act, 2013 deal with change of name which says that the name of the company can be changed by a special resolution and with the approval of the Central Government (Registrar of Companies). Approval of Central Government is not required if the change relates to the additi...
    Read more

    M&A Tip-1

    In M&A transactions, legal due diligence often focuses on financial figures, corporate structures, and compliance checkboxes. But here’s a crucial angle that often gets overlooked:  • While reviewing contracts, do we truly recognize their broader implications on the deal’s viability? One of the most underappreciated risks in an M&A deal lies in contractual obligations that may either hinder or enhance the target company's future growth. Take exclusivity agreements or change of control clauses, for example. These can severely limit a company's operational flexibility post-transaction, potentially negating the value of the deal. Consider a scenario where the target company is locked into exclusive supply agreements. Post-acquisition, this could restrict the buyer's ability to expand supplier networks, driving up costs and reducing profit margins. Without catching these red flags early, the buyer might face serious operational challenges after the deal closes. So, what...
    Read more